Think RDF is complicated?
Well, does this look complicated?
Because that's all the LIT uses.
Still think RDF might be complicated!?
Google's Dan Brickley doesn't think so:
"People think RDF is a pain because it is complicated. The truth is even worse. RDF is painfully simplistic, but it allows you to work with real-world data and problems that are horribly complicated."
(full quote)
Don't start modelling with Schema.org.
Why? Read their own blog post (2014): 'Role'
Vocab namespace IRI's - keep separate IRI's (from gist).